Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8

[chip <chip.gwyn () gmail com>]

Perhaps we should all take a moment and review RFC 5735, 6598, 6890, and
5156 and implement filtering in the appropriate places and help make the
Internet a safer place to play.  Think of the children!

...heh

--chip


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Siegel, David <David.Siegel () level3 com>
> wrote:
> > This should now be fixed.
> >
> > As a general matter of policy, we do filter out 10/8, but somehow the
> filter list for a customer was empty which then defaults to an implicit
> accept.  We're in the process of improving our config audits to catch this
> in the future.
> >
>
> what happens if they register a route object for 10/8? :)
>
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Sheldon [mailto:LarrySheldon () cox net]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:31 PM
> > To: nanog () nanog org
> > Subject: Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8
> >
> > On 7/20/2013 11:26 PM, Yang Yu wrote:
> > > It appears AS3549 is announcing 10.0.0.0/8. I noticed it from an
> > > AS3549 customer.
> >
> > I wonder why people don't drop any update that contains stuff like RFC
> > 1918 space.
> > --
> > Requiescas in pace o email           Two identifying characteristics
> >                                          of System Administrators:
> > Ex turpi causa non oritur actio      Infallibility, and the ability to
> >                                          learn from their mistakes.
> >                                            (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)


-- 
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....