nanog mailing list archives

Re: Gmail and SSL


From: Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:25:45 -0500


On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Matthias Leisi <matthias () leisi net> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Damian Menscher <damian () google com> wrote:


While I'm writing, I'll also point out that the Diginotar hack which came
up in this discussion as an example of why CAs can't be trusted was
discovered due to a feature of Google's Chrome browser when a cert was


Similar to
http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.ch/2013/01/enhancing-digital-certificate-security.html?

Thanks; I was just about to post that link to this thread.

Certificates don't spread virally, and random browsers don't go looking
for whatever interesting certificates they find.  They also don't like
certs that say "*.google.com" when the user is trying to go somewhere else;
that web site would be non-functional unless it was trying to impersonate
a Google domain.  Taken all together, this sounds to me like deliberate
mischief by someone.  In fact, were it not for the facts that the blog
post says that Google learned of this on December 24 and this thread started
on December 14, I'd wonder if there was a connection -- was this the
incident that made Google reassess its threat model?

Of course, this attack was carried out within the official PKI framework...

                --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb







Current thread: