nanog mailing list archives
Re: Gmail and SSL
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:46:20 -0500
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf () dessus com> wrote:
Perhaps Googles other "harvesters" and the government agents they sell or give user credentials to, don't work against privately (not under the goverment thumb) encryption keys without the surveillance state expending significantly more resources. Perhaps the cheapest way to solve this is to apply thumbscrews and have google require the use of co-option freindly keying material by their victims errr customers errr users.
you lost me in conspiracy theories, can you rephrase?
Current thread:
- Re: Gmail and SSL Christopher Morrow (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gmail and SSL Keith Medcalf (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Christopher Morrow (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Matthew Palmer (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Mike Jones (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Jimmy Hess (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Scott Howard (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Keith Medcalf (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Steven Bellovin (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Randy Bush (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Steven Bellovin (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Seth David Schoen (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Steven Bellovin (Jan 02)