nanog mailing list archives

Re: Gmail and SSL


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:46:20 -0500

On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf () dessus com> wrote:
Perhaps Googles other "harvesters" and the government agents they sell or
give user credentials to, don't work against privately (not under the
goverment thumb) encryption keys without the surveillance state expending
significantly more resources.

Perhaps the cheapest way to solve this is to apply thumbscrews and have
google require the use of co-option freindly keying material by their
victims errr customers errr users.

you lost me in conspiracy theories, can you rephrase?


Current thread: