nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Mark Foster <blakjak () blakjak net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:18:27 +1300
On 10/01/13 17:15, Karl Auer wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:14 -0600, Otis L. Surratt, Jr. wrote:FYI - I have a PTR for all IPs. Just general practice.All IPs actually in use, or all possible IPs in a network? If the latter, then it's not gunna fly for IPv6. Not at all. Not unless you synthesise the responses - in which case there is no point to requiring them anyway. Regards, K.
$GENERATE, as someone else pointed out, solves that problem for you? (Does it scale for IPv6? I can't recall - but surely this could be scripted too.) I though the point of doing so was to establish with some degree of accuracy that there were 'real people' behind the administration of said IP, and that there was a somewhat increased level of accountability as a result - which suggests there is infact a point.
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Daniel Taylor (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats joel jaeggli (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Matthias Leisi (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Warren Bailey (Jan 09)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Jan 09)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Foster (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jeff Kell (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John R. Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- PTRs for IPv6 (was Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats) Lee Howard (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Måns Nilsson (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)