nanog mailing list archives

Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat


From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:39:13 -0500

Scott Weeks wrote:

--- calin.chiorean () secdisk net wrote:

You seem "upset" that they are using M$ only(target and
source).
I'm not upset.  I'm pointing out what Steven Bellovin said
in just a few words: "This strongly suggests that it's not
their A-team..."

This is a technical mailing list where cutting edge stuff
is discussed.  The compromise was not using cutting edge
stuff and, so, is a big <yawn> for this list.


Not to be pedantic, but I thought the list was about network operations - and
as much (or more) about practice, than about "cutting edge stuff." (Well
maybe a little pedantic.)

From an operational point of view, unless I'm an exceptionally high-value
target, I'm more likely to be threatened by the B-team (or C-team), than the A-team (recognizing, of course, that what the A-team is doing today, is what the
script kiddies will be doing tomorrow).

Miles Fidelman



--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra



Current thread: