nanog mailing list archives
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:39:13 -0500
Scott Weeks wrote:
--- calin.chiorean () secdisk net wrote:You seem "upset" that they are using M$ only(target and source).I'm not upset. I'm pointing out what Steven Bellovin said in just a few words: "This strongly suggests that it's not their A-team..." This is a technical mailing list where cutting edge stuff is discussed. The compromise was not using cutting edge stuff and, so, is a big <yawn> for this list.
Not to be pedantic, but I thought the list was about network operations - and
as much (or more) about practice, than about "cutting edge stuff." (Well maybe a little pedantic.) From an operational point of view, unless I'm an exceptionally high-valuetarget, I'm more likely to be threatened by the B-team (or C-team), than the A-team (recognizing, of course, that what the A-team is doing today, is what the
script kiddies will be doing tomorrow). Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Current thread:
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat, (continued)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Warren Bailey (Feb 20)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Rich Kulawiec (Feb 21)
- RE: NYT covers China cyberthreat Naslund, Steve (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Rich Kulawiec (Feb 26)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Kyle Creyts (Feb 26)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Adele Thompson (Feb 26)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Kyle Creyts (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Stephen Sprunk (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Miles Fidelman (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Jack Bates (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Michael Painter (Feb 22)