nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ddos mitigation service
From: Beavis <pfunix () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 14:43:45 -0600
+1 on Dosarrest, not so crazy price, used them before their support is awesome. Used to be called whypigsfly, heard that some of their techniques of mitigation we're used by prolexic as well. I'm not a sales rep. nor will I ever be. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Joseph Chin <l-nanog () iodi se> wrote:
From my personal experience, I am a fan of pure-play DDoS mitigation service providers (e.g. Prolexic, Dosarrest) because they are the least likely to give up on you when things get real difficult. Read the SLA careful to make sure it is fit for your purpose. -----Original Message----- From: James Thomas [mailto:jim () nimblesec com] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 3:49 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Ddos mitigation service Hi Pierre, Thank you for your interesting note. On 01/02/2013 09:57, Pierre Lamy wrote:The 3 major scrubbing vendors: Prolexic Verisign AkamaiIIRC, CloudFlare claims to the same capcity of DDOS mitigation as Prolexic (500gb) and also has a free option with fewer scrubbing features. Do you have experience with it, or is there some other reason to have excluded it from your list? I apologize for my noobish question. Cheers, James
-- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Disclaimer: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Current thread:
- Re: Ddos mitigation service Pierre Lamy (Feb 01)
- RE: Ddos mitigation service Paul Stewart (Feb 01)
- Re: Ddos mitigation service Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 01)
- Re: Ddos mitigation service Hank Nussbacher (Feb 08)
- Re: Ddos mitigation service Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 01)
- Re: Ddos mitigation service James Thomas (Feb 01)
- Re: Ddos mitigation service Pierre Lamy (Feb 01)
- RE: Ddos mitigation service Joseph Chin (Feb 01)
- Re: Ddos mitigation service Beavis (Feb 02)
- RE: Ddos mitigation service Paul Stewart (Feb 01)