Re: BRAS

[Dan White <dwhite () olp net>]

On 12/11/13 10:10 -0500, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
> At 09:30 AM 11/12/2013, Dan White wrote:
> > On 12/10/13 19:51 +0530, Nilesh Kahar wrote:
> > > Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with
> > > full QoS & other features?
> >
> > Juniper MX (480).
>
> I heard there were some issues with the LAC/LNS functionality on the 
> MX series vs. JUNOSe on the E series.  Is that still the case?

I have not used those features with the platform, so I can't confirm. The
box has been very solid for us as a subscriber management platform for
q-in-q termination.

--
Dan White