nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is there a method or tool(s) to prove network outages?


From: Sina Owolabi <notify.sina () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 20:02:50 +0000

Hmm. Great points. Didn't think of that. 

Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:50:31 
To: <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Is there a method or tool(s) to prove network outages?

On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 05:56:51PM +0100, Notify Me wrote:
Please I have a very problematic radio link which goes out and back on
again every few hours.
The only way I know this is happening is from my gateway device: a Sophos
UTM that sends email anytime there's been an outage.

The ISP refuses to accept this as outage/instability proof, and I'm
wondering if there's something I can run behind the gateway UTM that can
provide output information over time.

I'm surprised nobody's mentioned the root question to answer before you go
off spending time setting up anything in particular: what *will* the ISP
accept (or be forced to accept) as outage/instability proof?  Contracts are
your first line of defence, but it's nigh-on universal that they don't cover
these sorts of situations well enough.  So you probably need to have a
discussion, as a follow-on from being told that your UTM's e-mails *aren't*
sufficient, to determine what *is* sufficient.

Once you've got that, only then can you evaluate appropriate methods of
gathering the necessary data to support a claim of an outage.  I like the
*idea* of smokeping, but when gathering data on complete service loss (which
was my use case for it as well) I found its methods of collecting and
displaying that data to be very suboptimal and counter-intuitive.

For something small and once-off like this, I'd probably just break out my
text editor and script up something that would collect the relevant data and
process it into the acceptable form.

- Matt



Current thread: