nanog mailing list archives

Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:35:44 -0500

Jamie, methinks you are confusing 2002 with 2001....

Jared Mauch

On Dec 7, 2013, at 11:26 AM, jamie rishaw <j () arpa com> wrote:

(A little late but) it's reachable for me -- Funny tho that something at
cisco is IPv6 via a v4<->v6 (2001::)  :-)

jamie


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Geraint Jones <geraint () koding com> wrote:

Its the reason deduplication makes the storage savings it does :)
--
Geraint Jones




On 6/12/13 2:52 pm, "Richard Porter" <richard () pedantictheory com> wrote:

*Sarcasm* but lawyers seem to think it is REALLY important to add that
load to email servers, backup servers and storage :). I wonder how much
extra storage those simple extra bits/bytes have taken over the years?

~Richard

On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Rogan Schlassa <roganschlassa () gmail com>
wrote:

Please dont reply back with such legal disclaimers.  It is basically
SPAM
and of course nonsense.

The thought that you can send a email and force your companies terms on
us
is rediculous.

If CISCO forces that in your sig then for one tell them to fuck off and
two
use a different email.
On Dec 5, 2013 3:56 PM, "John Stuppi (jstuppi)" <jstuppi () cisco com>
wrote:

Thanks folks.  Blogs.cisco.com should be back up now for both IPv4 and
v6.

Thanks,
John

"We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone."




John Stuppi, CISSP
Technical Leader
Strategic Security Research
jstuppi () cisco com
Phone: +1 732 516 5994
Mobile: 732 319 3886

CCIE, Security - 11154
Cisco Systems
Mail Stop INJ01/2/
111 Wood Avenue South
Iselin, New Jersey 08830
United States
Cisco.com



Think before you print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole
use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by
reply email and delete all copies of this message.
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html





-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared () puck nether net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 9:23 AM
To: Henri Wahl
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: blogs.cisco.com not available via IPv6

I'm seeing it down via IPv6:

*   Trying 2600:1407:9:295::90...
* Connected to www.cisco.com (2600:1407:9:295::90) port 80 (#0)
GET / HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: curl/7.30.0
Host: www.cisco.com
Accept: */*
< HTTP/1.1 200 OK
* Server Apache is not blacklisted


* About to connect() to blogs.cisco.com port 80 (#0)
*   Trying 2001:4800:13c1:10::178...
^C

- Jared

On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Henri Wahl <h.wahl () ifw-dresden de> wrote:

Hi,
can anybody from Cisco confirm that blogs.cisco.com
(2001:4800:13c1:10::178) is not available via IPv6?
Regards

--
Henri Wahl

IT Department
Leibniz-Institut fuer Festkoerper- u.
Werkstoffforschung Dresden

tel: (03 51) 46 59 - 797
email: h.wahl () ifw-dresden de
http://www.ifw-dresden.de

Nagios status monitor Nagstamon:
http://nagstamon.ifw-dresden.de

DHCPv6 server dhcpy6d:
http://dhcpy6d.ifw-dresden.de

IFW Dresden e.V., Helmholtzstrasse 20, D-01069 Dresden VR Dresden Nr.
1369
Vorstand: Prof. Dr. Juergen Eckert, Dr. h.c. Dipl.-Finw. Rolf Pfrengle
<0x1FBA0942.asc>


-- 
"sharp, dry wit and brash in his dealings with contestants." - Forbes
If voting didn't matter, the GOP wouldn't make it more difficult than
buying a gun.
/*     - teh jamie. ;     uri -> http://about.me/jgr     */


Current thread: