nanog mailing list archives
Re: subrate SFP?
From: Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:30:24 -0400
I think this is a great idea. Maybe not a huge market, but I would buy them, instead of having to use dumb transceivers. It would be interesting to have some other smart SFP options too, like macsec for example... Tim:> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:
I actually emailed RAD, MethodE and Avago yesterday and pitched the idea. MiTOP is my exact justification why it should technically be feasible. I guess it would be easier to pitch, if there would be commitment to buy, but I don't personally need many units, just 1-2 here and there. On 30 August 2013 11:56, Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk> wrote:There is absolutely no reason that you couldn't deliver 'mediaconverter'or '2 port switch' in a SFP casingYes, similar devices exist http://www.rad.com/10/SFP-Format-TDM-Pseudowire-Gateway/10267/ so it probably just needs more demand brandon-- ++ytti
-- Tim:>
Current thread:
- Re: subrate SFP?, (continued)
- Re: subrate SFP? Saku Ytti (Aug 29)
- RE: subrate SFP? Jamie Bowden (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? Jimmy Hess (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Charles N Wyble (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Joel Jaeggli (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Nick B (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Jima (Aug 31)
- Re: subrate SFP? Saku Ytti (Aug 29)
- Re: subrate SFP? Saku Ytti (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? sthaug (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? Tim Durack (Aug 30)
- Re: subrate SFP? Saku Ytti (Aug 30)