nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table
From: Aled Morris <aledm () qix co uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 17:55:15 +0100
Cisco published an advisory on OSPF vulnerability yesterday I think. I assume it's related. OSPFv3 is not vulnerable, and connections protected by MD5 are safe too, apparently. Aled On 2 August 2013 17:40, Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com> wrote:
Hi, Does anybody have details on what this vulnerability is? https://www.blackhat.com/us-13/briefings.html#Nakibly Glen
Current thread:
- OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Glen Kent (Aug 02)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Adam Atkinson (Aug 02)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Aled Morris (Aug 02)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Jimmy Hess (Aug 03)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Saku Ytti (Aug 04)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Jimmy Hess (Aug 04)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Saku Ytti (Aug 04)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Jeff Tantsura (Aug 04)
- Re: OSPF Vulnerability - Owning the Routing Table Jimmy Hess (Aug 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details Jimmy Hess (Aug 04)
- Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details Warren Bailey (Aug 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details Larry Sheldon (Aug 04)
- Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details Andrew Koch (Aug 05)