nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and HTTPS
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:53:50 -0700
I don't see turning IPv4 off as a short-term goal for anyone. OTOH, I do see the cost of maintaining residential IPv4 service escalating over about the next 5-7 years. Lee Howard sees roughly the same thing. (He has fancier math and better statistics than I used). Bottom line, it is unlikely that $residential_price will be sufficient to sustain residential IPv4 service(s) beyond about 2018. The biggest question in that equation will be what percentage of residential users are behind the unmaintainable CGN solutions and what percentage retain service similar to the current (sad) state of affairs. For the customers in the latter category, they might be able to continue until their addresses are needed for more profitable services. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS shawn wilson (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 26)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Mark Andrews (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Erik Muller (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jima (Apr 27)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jimmy Hess (Apr 28)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Jack Bates (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Michael Thomas (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS joel jaeggli (Apr 29)
- Re: IPv6 and HTTPS Mark Andrews (Apr 28)