nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC becomes Visio
From: Cutler James R <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:15:14 -0400
On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com> wrote:
<SNIP/> The proper approach is to ask the vendor for RFC 1149 trasport for the BGP session, and whether it terminates in a shared cage, or if a fully private one is required. Including an 'envionmental impact statement'. Explaining that this info is required in order to produce an accurate Visio diagram.
Ladies and gentlemen, it seems that we have a winner!
Current thread:
- RFC becomes Visio Joe Maimon (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Randy Carpenter (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Seth Mattinen (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Mike Lyon (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Jim Mercer (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Robert Bonomi (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Cutler James R (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Mike Lyon (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Rhys Rhaven (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Randy Carpenter (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Richard Porter (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Randy Carpenter (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio TJ (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Gary E. Miller (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)