nanog mailing list archives

Re: Big Temporary Networks


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:04:22 -0400

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com> wrote:
'Right to work', as defined by section 14 B of the Taft-Hartley Act, only
prevents a union contract that requiures union membership as a PRE-REQUISITE
for being hired.  What is called  'closed shop' -- where employment is
closed to those who are not union members.
It does -not- prevent a 'union ship' -- where employees are required to
join the union within a reasonable period =after= being hired.

The Taft-Hartley Act outlawed closed shops nationwide. It further
authorized individual states to outlaw union shops and/or agency
shops. 23 states, including my fine home state of Virginia, have done
so.


Right-to-work also does not prevent an organization from requiring, by
contractual agreement, that third parties performing work ON THE
0ORGANIZATION'S PREMISES, employ "union labor" for _that_ work.  It
cannot specify _what_ union (or local) however.

In Illinois, which has not enacted a state right-to-work law, that's
correct. In Virginia, which has, there was just recently a big
hullabaloo where the airports authority tried (and spectacularly
failed) to place a union preference rule in their contracting process
where bids from union shops would have a 10% preference versus bids
from non union shops.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: