nanog mailing list archives

Re: Regarding smaller prefix for hijack protection


From: Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddiqui () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:29:57 +0500

The thing to acknowledge is that you've realized it otherwise if you follow
the CIDR report than you will find bunch of arrogant folks/SPs not willing
to understand the dilemma they are causing through de-aggregation.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui


On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com> wrote:

I didn't realized the routing table size problem with /24's. Stupid me.



Thanks everyone for updates. Appreciate good answers.




Current thread: