nanog mailing list archives

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)


From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 21:45:19 -0700

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

On Sep 5, 2012, at 21:08 , Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:

Jimmy Hess wrote:

NAT would fall under design flaw, because it breaks end-to-end
connectivity, such that there is no longer an administrative choice
that can be made to restore it  (other than redesign with NAT
removed).

The end to end transparency can be restored easily, if an
administrator wishes so, with UPnP capable NAT and modified
host transport layer.


This is every bit as much BS as it was the first 6 times you pushed it.


Yep.


Current thread: