nanog mailing list archives

Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now


From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:01:30 +0900

tom () ninjabadger net wrote:

It depends on distance between senders and receivers.

However, at certain distance it becomes impossible to use
efficient (w.r.t. bits per symbol) encoding, because of
noise of repeated EDFA amplification.

<500km not enough?

https://www.de-cix.net/news-events/latest-news/news/article/de-cix-chooses-adva-optical-networkings-100g-metro-solution/
 

As it says:

        ADVA Optical Networking's 100G Metro solution is built on
        4x28G direct detection technology

and I wrote:

        Still, for 100GE, under some circumstances, 100GE with 4*25G may
        become less expensive than 10*10GE.

100GE over 500km could be fine.

For 50Gbps lane, it becomes even harder and, for 100Gbps lane,
it will likely to be impossible.

Tell this to Ciena... ;)

If you can afford Wave Logic 3 interfaces for your Nortel^WCiena 6500's, 
you'll find some pretty impressive things are actually possible, 
including 100G per 100GHz guide over very large distances (think 
Atlantic-large).

I'm afraid it uses 8 or 4 lanes.

Coherence appears to be the secret sauce in pushing the SnR boundaries,

Just +3db, which is already counted, nothing more than that.

http://www.peering-forum.eu/assets/presentations2012/JunpierEPF7.pdf

But, it does not say much about >100G.

Yes, that is the one. Slide #11 is the one I'm referring to, 'Projection 
of Form Factor Evolution to 400G', which is relevant to the discussion 
on optic densities and the push above 100G.

As I wrote from the beginning that:

        (if same plug and cable are used both for 100GE and 10*10GE).

physical form factors can be identical between 100GE (10*10G) and
10*10GE.

Thus, the point of the slide #11 is not a valid counter argument
against my point that trunked 40*10GE or 16*25GE is no worse than
actually trunked 400GE with 40*10G or 16*25G.

While slide #12 mentions 50Gbps per lane, it is too often impossible
to be as practical as the Ethernet today.

                                                Masataka Ohta


Current thread: