nanog mailing list archives
Re: IOS architecture
From: Aled Morris <aledm () qix co uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:01:43 +0000
On 29 October 2012 12:43, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:16:10 +0100, "Darren O'Connor" said:All vendors should be writing in depth architecture books. The JuniperMXbook is a great example. Tell us exactly what your product can do andwe'lllikely use more of itOn the flip side, if you document what your product is probably incapable of due to the design architecture, the salescritters won't be able to sell as many of them... :)
I think the biggest problem in that regard is the gap between what the switch or router architecture is capable of and what the current release of IOS actually supports. This is generally what appears on the "roadmap" but, historically, not all of it gets delivered in a timely manner, and some features aren't delivered at all before the hardware is superseded. Aled
Current thread:
- IOS architecture Andrey Khomyakov (Oct 26)
- Re: IOS architecture David Swafford (Oct 26)
- RE: IOS architecture Darren O'Connor (Oct 27)
- Re: IOS architecture Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: IOS architecture Aled Morris (Oct 29)
- RE: IOS architecture Darren O'Connor (Oct 27)
- Re: IOS architecture David Swafford (Oct 26)
- Re: IOS architecture Pete Lumbis (Oct 27)
- Re: IOS architecture Lukasz Bromirski (Oct 28)
- Re: IOS architecture Rupert Goodwins (Oct 28)