nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet-wide port scans
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:46:14 -0400
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:48:47 -0400, Darius Jahandarie said:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:Want to re-write that section or should I respond now? ;-)I always thought it wasn't allowed because of 18 USC 2701, but IINAL, would be happy to hear otherwise :)
If a portscan allows access to stored communications, you have bigger problems.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Internet-wide port scans Florian Weimer (Oct 15)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Darius Jahandarie (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Scott Weeks (Oct 15)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Bacon Zombie (Oct 16)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Darius Jahandarie (Oct 16)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Darius Jahandarie (Oct 16)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 16)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Jimmy Hess (Oct 16)
- Re: Internet-wide port scans Jay Ashworth (Oct 16)