nanog mailing list archives
Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO)
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:10:08 -0700
--- sh.vahabzadeh () gmail com wrote: From: Shahab Vahabzadeh <sh.vahabzadeh () gmail com> It was TCP and I think it was not a DDoS attack because the traffic was not heavy. ------------------------------- Many/most DoS attacks do not push up the traffic levels considerably. You can see this when looking at packet per second (pps) rates. You may see high pps on the attacked machines, but no correlating large increase in bps traffic rates. scott
Current thread:
- Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Shahab Vahabzadeh (Oct 14)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Dobbins, Roland (Oct 14)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Shahab Vahabzadeh (Oct 14)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Nick Hilliard (Oct 14)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Dobbins, Roland (Oct 14)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Dobbins, Roland (Oct 14)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Ryan Malayter (Oct 15)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Dobbins, Roland (Oct 15)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Steven Noble (Oct 15)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Shahab Vahabzadeh (Oct 14)
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Dobbins, Roland (Oct 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Attacking on Source Port 0 (ZERO) Scott Weeks (Oct 14)