nanog mailing list archives

Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T


From: Brian Loveland <brian () aereo com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:37:30 -0400

Sorry, that is IBM G8264T.  G8316 is the 16x40G version.

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Brian Loveland <brian () aereo com> wrote:

Also, IBM G8364 (uses Broadcom Trident merchant silicon).

I believe the Force10 S4810 (also Broadcom Trident) is only SFP+?

Intel will force 10GBASE-T on all of us since they can make it backwards
compatible with 1000BASE-T.  I think this will make the technology take off
over the next year or so.

Been very happy running SFP+ twinax but sometimes I do wish I could go
further than 5/7/8.5 meters.


On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs () xs4all net>wrote:

In article <
CAJ0Nkqgy2x9pUg26CcjcHwDQSMY24f1U0RWmhF2PoH2eHih2zg () mail gmail com>,
Andreas Echavez  <andreas () livejournalinc com> wrote:
Does anyone here have experience running copper 10Gbase-T networks? It
seems like the standard just died out.

Well, our new supermicro servers come with 10Gbase-T standard on
the motherboard.

For us it would make a lot of sense
for our applications -- even if throughput and latency aren't as great.
If
anyone out there knows of any *copper* 10 gig-t switches (48 port?)

Arista, http://www.aristanetworks.com/

Mike.





Current thread: