Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

[Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com>]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins () arbor net>
> wrote:
> > On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> >
> > > Ipv6 is not important for users, it is important for network operators
> who want to sustain their business.
> > I agree with the first part; not sure I agree with the second part.
> >
> > > Nope. Nobody will leave money on the table by alienating users.
> >
> > I think it may be possible to make money with compelling IPv6-only
> content/services/applications.
> >
>
> I disagree, i simply see an additional fee for IPv4 coming about.


+1

And that in itself seems like it would make IPv6-reachable things a lot
more compelling.