Re: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header

[David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>]

Please don't feed the bigoted hypocritical trolls.

Regards,
-drc

On Nov 25, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Randy <randy_94108 () yahoo com> wrote:

> Just because it is from Iraq; does NOT mean by any streach of the imagination that OP is a terrorist!
> You need to get outside the box you are living in and learn to separate the forest from the trees!
>
> You are "entitled" to you private-opinions. Don't post said-garbage on NANOG!
>
> I do take exception to such garbage; while other's might not.
>
> ./Randy
>
> --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ipdog () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > From: Network IPdog <network.ipdog () gmail com>
> > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> > To: "'Randy'" <randy_94108 () yahoo com>
> > Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 6:43 PM
> > The email address is
> > from…   auis.edu.iq = Iraq
> >
> > Sometimes persons living inside the box cannot see the
> > forest because of the
> > trees.
> >
> > PEACE
> >
> >
> > Ephesians 4:32  &  Cheers!!!
> >
> > A password is like a... toothbrush  ;^) 
> > Choose a good one, change it regularly and don't share it.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Randy [mailto:randy_94108 () yahoo com]
> >
> > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:52 PM
> > To: Network IPdog
> > Cc: nanog () nanog org
> > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> >
> > WHAT???
> >
> > Is this the extent to which This-List has DEGENERATED???
> >
> > How dare you make such a horrendous accusation Sir?
> >
> > You may NOT like what OP has proposed. I don't either for
> > more reasons than
> > one!
> >
> > However, YOU are neither qualified NOR authorised to ask
> > such an appallingly
> > INSENSITIVE Question!
> >
> > Your so called "Freedom-of-Speech" DOES NOT translate to
> > Character-Assasination on this or any other forum!!
> >
> > Follow me you ipdog? Find you own bitch to abuse. Don't do
> > it here!!
> >
> > ./Randy
> >
> > --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ipdog () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Network IPdog <network.ipdog () gmail com>
> > > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> > > To: "'John Adams'" <jna () retina net>,
> > "'Ammar Salih'" 
> > > <ammar.salih () auis edu iq>
> > > Cc: nanog () nanog org
> > > Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 3:16 PM Et al,
> > >
> > > There is one simple question that needs to be asked!
> > >
> > >
> > > Ammar Salih @ ammar.salih () auis edu iq
> > > Are you a terrorist? 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ephesians 4:32  &  Cheers!!!
> > >
> > > A password is like a... toothbrush  ;^) Choose a good
> > one, change it 
> > > regularly and don't share it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Adams [mailto:jna () retina net]
> > > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:20 PM
> > > To: Ammar Salih
> > > Cc: nanog () nanog org
> > > list
> > > Subject: Re: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header
> > >
> > > Your proposal doesn't even give people a way to encrypt
> > their location 
> > > data; By moving geodata to a portion of the protocol
> > which is not 
> > > covered by commonly used encryption methods (i.e.
> > HTTPS, which is up a 
> > > few layers in the stack) people can't be protected
> > should this data be 
> > > monitored by a malicious intermediary. Think: Syria,
> > China, Iran, or 
> > > any other government which will kill you for your words
> > online.
> > > Application protocols sending GPS data under say, HTTPS
> > protect the 
> > > end user from revealing their location to anyone on
> > their path, 
> > > forcing an intermediary to look up the IP in a common
> > geo database 
> > > which will be mostly inaccurate in pinpointing users,
> > and hopefully 
> > > will save lives.
> > >
> > > Companies like Twitter, Facebook, and some parts of
> > google are going 
> > > HTTPS by default for this very reason.
> > >
> > > This proposal is dead, you don't have the sense to lie
> > down.
> > >