nanog mailing list archives

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration


From: Blair Trosper <blair.trosper () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:24:41 -0600

I've found myself becoming a snob about IPv6.  I almost look down on
IPv4-only networks in the same way that I won't go see a film that isn't
projected on DLP unless my arm is twisted.  I'm a convert, and I'm glad to
see the adoption rate edging up.

However, I still scratch my head on why most major US ISPs *have* robust
IPv6 peering and infrastructure and are ready to go, but they have not
turned it on for their fiber/cable/DSL customers for reasons that are not
clear to me.

I keep pestering my home ISP about turning it on (since their network is
now 100% DOCSIS 3), but they just seem to think I'm making up words.  One
can hope, though.

Blair

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:53 AM, TJ <trejrco () gmail com> wrote:

 On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:14:18 +0100
Tomas Podermanski <tpoder () cis vutbr cz> wrote:

    It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
time when native IPv6 on google statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
Funny enough, the peaks are indicating... week-ends !
Do people use more google during the WE, or do they have more IPv6 @
home ?


 Purely anecdotally, I can say: Yes.
Atleast in my case I have native IPv6 at home and via my mobile devices,
but not at my client sites.
*Sidenote: That's why I am at those client sites, helping 'fix' that. ;)
...
*


/TJ



Current thread: