nanog mailing list archives

Re: High CPU utilization w/VRF NAT - Cat6500


From: harbor235 <harbor235 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:43:40 -0500

What Supervisior do you have? If its an older SUP NAT may be done in
software, which sounds
like you are currently experiencing. Its not hard to max out a 6500 CPU.


-Mike


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Kenneth McRae
<kenneth.mcrae () dreamhost com>wrote:

I would recommend you do this on a firewall (fwsm or something external)..

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown () gmail com
wrote:

~80 or so static NAT's configured, multiple versions of IOS tested.
Most of the traffic is being punted to the CPU through the NAT interfaces
causing high CPU utilization.

Increasing fast aging timers had 0 benefit, TCAM utilization is less than
5%
Does anyone have any thoughts on other configuration tweaks I should
try? I
think we're at the point where new hardware maybe FWSM or another
platform
for NAT should be explored.

--RB




--
Best Regards,



Kenneth McRae
*Sr. Network Engineer*
kenneth.mcrae () dreamhost com
Ph: 323-375-3814
www.dreamhost.com



Current thread: