nanog mailing list archives

Re: Indonesian ISP Moratel announces Google's prefixes


From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:30:18 +0200

At 20:48 06/11/2012 -0800, Jian Gu wrote:

Ahhh...blame the victim.  Google - shame on you.

-Hank

What do you mean hijack? Google is peering with Moratel, if Google does not
want Moratel to advertise its routes to Moratel's peers/upstreams, then
Google should've set the correct BGP attributes in the first place.

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com> wrote:

> Another case of route hijack -
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/why-google-went-offline-today-and-a-bit-about
>
>
>
> I am curious if big networks have any pre-defined filters for big content
> providers like Google to avoid these? I am sure internet community would be
> working in direction to somehow prevent these issues. Curious to know
> developments so far.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
>
> Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
> Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
> Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>
>



Current thread: