Re: Industry practice for BGP costs - one time or fixed/monthly?

[Adam <ajarvela () gmail com>]

Edward's response nailed this one on the head.  It has to do with the
additional support/hardware required to support a BGP session.  Granted,
once a BGP session is established it rarely requires any tweaking, but I've
spent hours troubleshooting a downed BGP session because the client's IPS
signature update decided TCP/179 was malicious.

You also have to implement additional filters to protect yourself from what
your client can advertise.  I'm lucky enough to work for a major ISP with
pretty sophisticated filters built off the public route registry, but not
all ISPs have this functionality.

Adam

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Edward J. Dore <
edward.dore () freethought-internet co uk> wrote:

> The only thing that I can really think of is that the BGP sessions do take
> up extra CPU time and memory on the routing engine, so there is an
> additional cost to the provider in terms of needing more routers and/or
> bigger routers if they have lots of customers speaking BGP to them that
> they may not have factored in to their standard pricing.
>
> I guess there is also some extra cost in terms of NOC staff and systems to
> monitor the sessions as well as providing any troubleshooting etc. that
> they wouldn't have to do with "standard" customers that are statically
> routed.
>
> Edward Dore
> Freethought Internet
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anurag Bhatia" <me () anuragbhatia com>
> To: "NANOG Mailing List" <nanog () nanog org>
> Sent: Friday, 25 May, 2012 5:01:11 PM
> Subject: Industry practice for BGP costs - one time or fixed/monthly?
>
> Hello everyone
>
>
> I have been aggressively looking for deals in servers in Europe for
> anycasting. One thing which surprises me is the "setup costs" for BGP. Few
> providers quoted additional $50-100 which looks OK but a few of them quoted
> as high as $150 *extra every month* just for having BGP (no full routing
> table, but just default route pointing). Is there's any technical logic
> behind such heavy costs? I mean at the end of day we are all talking at
> layer 3 and thus it does not involves any hard connection/physical work.
> What other members pay for BGP setup costs?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
> or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected
> network!
>
> Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
> Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
> Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>