Re: pbx recco

[Andrew Latham <lathama () gmail com>]

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simon Perreault
<simon.perreault () viagenie ca> wrote:
> On 2012-05-15 19:01, Tom Hill wrote:
> > On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote:
> > > i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy.
> >
> >
> > I've been itching to try Freeswitch
>
>
> I know FreeSWITCH and Asterisk from the inside out because we ported both of
> them to IPv6.
>
> Verdict:
>
> - Asterisk started ugly but is getting much better very quickly. They
> actually have paid professional coders working on it, and it shows. They
> started participating in the IETF. They recently implemented ICE. They're on
> the right track.
>
> - FreeSWITCH started much prettier by reusing third-party libraries. But the
> glue code around these libs is absolutely horrendous. That glue code keeps
> growing and getting uglier. Their level of clue is dropping.
>
> Right now, I'd pick Asterisk over FreeSWITCH.
>
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

Thanks Simon, I was about to say something.  Users that have a hard
time with Asterisk do not understand it.

-- 
~ Andrew "lathama" Latham lathama () gmail com http://lathama.net ~