nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth
From: "A. Pishdadi" <apishdadi () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:23:53 -0500
dam, i think this got more replies then the original thread in 10 minutes. lol On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>wrote:
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org Tue May 1516:53:50 2012From: "A. Pishdadi" <apishdadi () gmail com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:51:20 -0500 Subject: Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth To: Nicolai <nicolai-nanog () chocolatine org> Cc: nanog () nanog org last time i checked .75 x 1000 = 7500.75 CENTS (as previously claimed) per meg is 750 CENTS per gig, or $7.50/gig. I suspect you 'meant '75 cents' (or '$0.75') per meg, but that is -not- what you said. :)On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Nicolai <nicolai-nanog () chocolatine org wrote:On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Ameen Pishdadi wrote:No way they stack up against level3 or any of the other 4 big tier 1s but if you throw them in a blend with level3 there shouldn't be any issue and I wouldn't pay more the .75 cents a meg for a gigThat's $7.50 per 1000mbps. Sign me up! Nicolai
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Marshall Eubanks (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Robert Bonomi (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Mark Andrews (May 17)
- Re: bgp.he.net (was: Cogent for ISP bandwidth) Rob Mosher (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jeroen van Aart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Peter Kristolaitis (May 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Frank Bulk (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Drew Weaver (May 15)