nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth


From: Justin Wilson <lists () mtin net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:33:26 -0400

        I have very little issues with Cogent in the Chicago/Indiana/St. Louis
areas. They are peered much better than they were a few years ago.

        We have 1 client at Cermack purchasing Cogent bandwidth through a third
party at well under $1 a meg.

        Justin


--
Justin Wilson <j2sw () mtin net>
Aol & Yahoo IM: j2sw
http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter



-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Baugher <jason () thebaughers com>
Date: Monday, May 14, 2012 6:03 PM
To: nanog <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

The emails on the Outages list reminded me to ask this question...

I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last
3 years as to their reliability and suitability as an upstream provider.
For a regional ISP looking for GigE ports in the Chicago/St. Louis area,
is Cogent a reasonable solution? Our gut feeling is that they don't
stack up against a Level3 or Sprint, but they are being very aggressive
with pricing to try and get our business.

Thanks,
Jason





Current thread: