nanog mailing list archives
Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:09:47 +0000
On 24/03/2012 00:32, George Bonser wrote:
I suggested this once when it was decided that the latency from California to the UK was too high and that I should reduce it. The company wouldn't go for it, though.
I assume they had a practical alternative to your proposition? Perhaps making light go faster? Nick
Current thread:
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms, (continued)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Simon Lyall (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms George Herbert (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Marshall Eubanks (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms George Herbert (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Marshall Eubanks (Mar 24)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Joel jaeggli (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Joly MacFie (Mar 24)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Joe Loiacono (Mar 26)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 26)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Joel jaeggli (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms ポール・ロラン (Mar 23)
- Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms Christopher Morrow (Mar 23)
- RE: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms George Bonser (Mar 23)