nanog mailing list archives
RE: shared address space... a reality!
From: George Bonser <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:59:12 +0000
-----Original Message----- From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com] In my perception, this is primarily a moving part that will be used by providers deploying IPv6 as a mechanism to compensate for things on the internet their customers want to reach that have not yet deployed IPv6.
I think it will be used mostly as the middle 4 in NAT444 and in links between networks where there are RFC1918 network assignment collisions. My gut tells me we will see that net block being used for NAT on a lot of VPNs between RFC1918 networks.
I don't think any sane provider will use this as yet another way to avoid deploying IPv4.
I hope you're right.
OTOH, the number of not sane providers is somewhat scary, but, hopefully not of sufficient critical mass as to be meaningful in the long term.
Current thread:
- Re: shared address space... a reality!, (continued)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Nate Davis (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! John Curran (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! cdel.firsthand.net (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)