RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

[Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org>]

Owen wrote:

[...]

> In the ARIN region I think we have pretty well prevented this last issue
> with current policy. I tried to propose similar policy in the APNIC region,
> but it was not well accepted there. The folks in Asia seem t want to cling
> to their scarcity mentality in IPv6 for the time being. I believe RIPE is
> issuing reasonably generous IPv6 allocations/assignments. I don't
> know enough about the goings on in AfriNIC or LACNIC to comment
> with any certainty.

You can see the prefix distribution in charts that are updated daily on our stats web site:

http://stats.research.icann.org/

HTH,

Leo