nanog mailing list archives
Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support
From: Scott Morris <swm () emanon com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:03:47 -0500
Hell, years ago, I only wanted to add three bits and give a set to each continent with one leftover for the United Federation of Planets (and Antarctica really didn't need one anyway)... I was told that would be geographically discriminating! :) Ah well, c'est la vie! Why be lazy when we can be more complicated? Scott On 3/6/12 4:22 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Guru NANOG wrote:Adding four more bits to the Left of the Source Address and setting those bits to 1111 (0xF) can help to start the migration to "Regions" and more IPv4 Addresses - Using and Re-Using legacy spectrum http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txtDrugs are bad, mmmmmkay? *plonk* jms
Current thread:
- IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Guru NANOG (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Randy Whitney (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Justin M. Streiner (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Scott Morris (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Jimmy Hess (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support David Conrad (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Randy Bush (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support David Conrad (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Tim Jackson (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Bjørn Mork (Mar 07)