nanog mailing list archives

Re: Evil Bit and Spread Spectrum IP Addressing - NANOG Source Address Shaping


From: Elle Plato <techgrrl () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:43:03 -0800

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Guru NANOG <nanog.guru () gmail com> wrote:
Common Misconception: One additional bit of IPv4 Addressing will solve
world hunger


Why not just fold source and destination into a single 64 bit end
station address field, and use the evil bit to say whether or not the
packet is going to, or coming from, google.  We could call it IPv5, or
IPv4++. and I am sure the merchants would have it in silicon within a
week.  Sadly this is a few weeks too early for people to be seriously
thinking of an RFC for this.

Elle Plato


Current thread: