nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:57:34 +0200
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:35:51AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
If it does, that's bad... You should never see IPv4 mapped addresses on the wire.
... and some networks filter packets with source address in the mapped range, so traceroute will be broken for 6PE intermediate P hops. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE james jones (Jun 15)
- RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) (Jun 15)
- RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE adam vitkovsky (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Owen DeLong (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Robert McKay (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Owen DeLong (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE valdis . kletnieks (Jun 15)