nanog mailing list archives
RE: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:30:19 -0600
This may result in mixed signals if a site on a SLD under .SECURE is actually compromised, which is more harmful than having no UI declaration.
The greatest advantage of .SECURE is that it will help ensure that all the high-value targets are easy to find. --- () ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org
Current thread:
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Jimmy Hess (Jun 03)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Jay Ashworth (Jun 03)
- RE: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Keith Medcalf (Jun 03)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 04)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Andrew Sullivan (Jun 04)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 04)