nanog mailing list archives
Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:46:14 +0000
Randy Bush <randy () psg com> writes:
...i have assiduously avoided gaining serious anti-spam fu. but it seems to me that ipv6 does not create/enable significantly more spam-bots.
the malware will generally have complete control over the bottom 64 bits of an ipv6 address. there's no reason to expect to ever receive more than one spam message from any single ipv6 source. so, we'll all be blackholing /64's. moreover, there are going to be more native endpoints in ipv6 than there were in ipv4, since the NAT incentives are very different in the larger address pool. so, we'll all need network operators to whitelist the parts of their address spaces that they plan to send e-mail from, so that we can avoid having to blackhole things one /64 at a time. as before: for more information see: http://www.circleid.com/posts/20110607_two_stage_filtering_for_ipv6_electronic_mail/ paul
Current thread:
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!), (continued)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Livingood, Jason (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Seth Mos (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Vlad Galu (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Matthew Kaufman (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Paul Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Paul Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)