nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 day and tunnels
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin () boeing com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:43:54 -0700
PMTU-d probing, as recently standardizes seems a more likely solution. Having CPE capable of TCP mss adjustment on v6 is another one. Being able to fragment when you want to is another good one as well.
I'll take a) and c), but don't care so much for b). About fragmenting, any tunnel ingress (VPNs included) can do inner fragmentation today independently of all other ingresses and with no changes necessary on the egress. It's just that they need to take precautions to avoid messing up the final destination's reassembly buffers. Fred fred.l.templin () boeing com
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels valdis . kletnieks (Jun 06)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 06)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 06)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 04)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 04)