nanog mailing list archives
RE: Question about Martians on Vyatta
From: Eric Germann <egermann () limanews com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:50:21 -0700
Well, I did when I checked them shortly after I saw the log messages. Wondering now if the routes for those bounced and in the "middle" of the bounce, they're considered martian. Thanks! EKG -----Original Message----- From: William Pitcock [mailto:nenolod () systeminplace net] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:45 AM To: Eric Germann Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Question about Martians on Vyatta On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Eric Germann <egermann () limanews com> wrote:
All, I'm trying to understand why a Vyatta 6.4 collection of routers is carping about the following as martian routes: 113.107.174.14 27.73.1.159 94.248.215.60 95.26.105.161 They don't look like they fall in the traditional martian space. I also wondered if they were addresses without a reverse route, but they have reverse paths in our routing tables (full routes from AS 10796 and 11530). Any thoughts? EKG
Do you have routing-table entries which cover those IPs? Try "ip route show <ip>" as root. Linux NET/4 stack considers (as far as IPv4/IPv6 go) anything that is not in the routing table or an immediate neighbour as "martian." William
Current thread:
- Question about Martians on Vyatta Eric Germann (Jun 28)
- Re: Question about Martians on Vyatta William Pitcock (Jun 28)
- RE: Question about Martians on Vyatta Eric Germann (Jun 28)
- Re: Question about Martians on Vyatta William Pitcock (Jun 28)
- RE: Question about Martians on Vyatta Eric Germann (Jun 28)
- Re: Question about Martians on Vyatta William Pitcock (Jun 28)