nanog mailing list archives

Re: MPLS L2VPN monitoring


From: Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:35:39 -0600

We also use UNI NIDs that trap interface status, log interface and COS
queue statistics, and respond to y.1731 traffic.

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Siegel, David <Dave.Siegel () level3 com> wrote:
We deploy NIDs to the customer premise.  You just can't get enough alarm data be looking only at your router/switch 
on your side of an Ethernet NNI to give you a proper indication of whether the service is functional, and it also 
happens to be quite handy to have when a performance test/verification is required.

There are a variety of vendors out there to choose from...we have quite a lot of Tellabs and Accedian out in the 
field.

I had hoped that last mile vendors would have been providing NIDs "smartjack" style by now in a fairly ubiquitous 
fashion, but alas none of them have stepped up to the plate so we're still putting them out there on our own dime.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ehiwe [mailto:peterehiwe () gmail com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:14 AM
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: MPLS L2VPN monitoring

Hello ,

For those who provide l2vpn services to customers over MPLS , what kind of tools do you use for monitoring the 
circuits  and what kind of values do you proactively monitor

I have tools in place to monitor these circuits but i want to know based on group members experiences in order to 
improve my monitoring platform for this circuits.

Thanks a lot!




Current thread: