nanog mailing list archives
Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
From: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:52:22 -0500
I am on sprint and my ip is always in the 20. net even though my wan up is totally different. Grant On Wednesday, July 18, 2012, TJ wrote:
Even if they did OK it (which i doubt), actually using it - especially in a public/customer facing / visible deployment - is a Bad Idea. *Traceability fail and possibly creating unreachable networks out there ...* /TJ On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Andrey Khomyakov < khomyakov.andrey () gmail com <javascript:;>> wrote:So some "comments" on the intertubes claim that DoD ok'd use of it's unadvertized space on private networks. Is there any official reference that may support this statement that anyone of you have seen out there? --Andrey
Current thread:
- Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Cameron Byrne (Jul 17)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT TJ (Jul 17)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Justin M. Streiner (Jul 17)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Andrey Khomyakov (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT TJ (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Grant Ridder (Jul 18)
- RE: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Chuck Church (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Måns Nilsson (Jul 19)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Dobbins, Roland (Jul 25)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT bmanning (Jul 19)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Andrey Khomyakov (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT joel jaeggli (Jul 25)