nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why use PeeringDB?
From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:47:28 -0400
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof () thejof com> wrote:
Good point. I suspect that enough large users (with money, developers, hosting, etc.) are enjoying it that it has reached a critical mass of a semi-core service that wont have a hard time getting some support going forward.
At the moment, I think there are 10-15 volunteers that help handle tickets and such, then 3-4 volunteers that help run the hardware/software. There seems to be good coverage for everything needed, as far as I can tell :). -- Darius Jahandarie
Current thread:
- Why use PeeringDB? Chris Grundemann (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Darius Jahandarie (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Zaid Ali (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Darius Jahandarie (Jul 18)
- Re: Why use PeeringDB? Jonathan Lassoff (Jul 18)