nanog mailing list archives
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:00:59 +0300
On (2012-07-18 08:47 -0500), Stephen Sprunk wrote:
And, if they did, who cares? It's not like it hurts me for them to do so--unless I'm dumb enough to do the same thing, happened to get the same result /and/ happened to merge with them--all of which are still unlikely events.
In which case, you could prove you did the right thing. I'm not disagreeing with you that benefits are marginal (I think most 'randomly' choose 0 anyhow). I'm asking, what would the recommend method lose by being verifiable? -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space, (continued)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Seth Mattinen (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Seth Mattinen (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Mark Andrews (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Saku Ytti (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space valdis . kletnieks (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Saku Ytti (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Stephen Sprunk (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Saku Ytti (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Michael Thomas (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Stephen Sprunk (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Saku Ytti (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Stephen Sprunk (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Saku Ytti (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Mark Andrews (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jimmy Hess (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Karl Auer (Jul 18)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jimmy Hess (Jul 18)