Re: NAT66 was Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space

[Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>]

In message <CAPiURgV+E-FLg_dkKq97P1OkhBWuZGiRVQd1GvY-Uh=09omREQ () mail gmail com>, Grant Ridder writes:
> If you are running an HA pair, why would you care which box it went back
> through?
>
> -Grant

It still doesn't change the arguement.  You still need to have flow
based routers or you may choose the wrong egress point and if you
need NAT66 you have 4+ upstream connections though two of them may
be tunnels.  You also need a protocol to keep the HA pair state
tables in sync.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org