Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space

[Mike Jones <mike () mikejones in>]

On 15 July 2012 16:58, Grzegorz Janoszka <Grzegorz () janoszka pl> wrote:
> Allowing 2000::/3 is fine as well. Btw - what are the estimates - how
> long are we going to be within 2000::/3?

I expect it to be long enough that we can enjoy lots of discussions
about how to deal with broken route filtering and broken software that
assumes only 2000::/3 is valid, and we can talk about how we should
have seen this coming and done something differently to prevent it.

- Mike