nanog mailing list archives

Re: job screening question


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:33:10 -0400

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org> wrote:
* If you're going to have to carefully examine each candidate's answers
  *anyway*, why not just get on the phone screen with them in the first
  place, and get HR out of the picture?  At least that way you're not
  wasting money paying for HR people, and you can do a far more in-depth
  interview because you're there, in real-time, to ask follow-up questions.

I don't know about you but my brain doesn't switch on a dime. I have
to *prepare* to conduct a phone interview. And afterward I have to
spool back up on whatever task I was working on. If a screening
question can cut many candidates who I'll know in 5 minutes aren't the
one, that saves me a lot more time than just the 5 minutes on the
phone.

Plus, frankly, I don't enjoy conducting interviews. It's necessary but
I find it stressful. Where I can avoid it with minimal risk of missing
the individual I actually want to hire, that makes me happy.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: