nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Update
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:13:07 -0700
In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the intent of the service. http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/ CB On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, "Mario Eirea" <meirea () charterschoolit com> wrote:
Has anyone seen this yet? Looks like Cisco was forcing people to join its
Cloud service through an update for it's consumer level routers.
http://www.neowin.net/news/cisco-locks-users-out-of-their-routers-requires-invasive-cloud-service
-Mario Eirea
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco Update, (continued)
- RE: Cisco Update Keith Medcalf (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeff Johnstone (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jimmy Hess (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 07)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeroen van Aart (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update Tyler Haske (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update goemon (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco Update Hank Nussbacher (Jul 06)