nanog mailing list archives

Re: Hotmail / MSN blacklisting policies.


From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 21:35:15 -0500 (EST)

On Sun, 1 Jan 2012, James Smallacombe wrote:

I have been doing this for 16 years. It has always been SOP to provide an offending email, with full headers to the complaint recipient, if not in advance of such blacklisting, then at least upon request.

There are/have been a number of well respected (not to mention most of the private ones) anti-spam BLs that either don't always or never provide "offending email" evidence to support listings, and I'm not aware of any that ever made it SOP to provide such evidence in advance of listing an
IP.

Hotmail listing one of your servers for no obvious reason is certainly the pot calling the kettle black. I get a pretty regular stream of pills spam from hotmail servers, most of which should trivially be blocked by the sender if they gave even the slightest damn about their outgoing spam.

They flat out refuse to do this, claiming they have no access to this.

With an org the size of hotmail, it's quite conceivable that the people dealing with you don't have access to the information you seek, assuming such information was even kept.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


Current thread: