nanog mailing list archives

Re: US DOJ victim letter


From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:30:47 +0000

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:20:08PM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Randy Epstein <nanog () hostleasing net> wrote:


On 1/27/12 1:23 PM, "Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:16:27 EST, Bryan Horstmann-Allen said:

Bit odd, if it's a phish. Even more odd if it's actually from the Fed.

What if it's a phish from a compromised Fed box? :)

We've spoken to folks at various FBI field offices and at 26 Plaza in New
York which is handling this case.  Further, John Curran (ARIN CEO) has
confirmed it's real via their own liaison and Paul Vixie is actually
working with them on this.



It's definitely real.

Best,

-M<


        I missed the part where ARIN turned over its address database w/ associatedd
        registration information to the Fed ... I mean I've always advocated for 
        LEO access, but ther has been significant pushback fromm the community on
        unfettered access to that data.  As I recall, there are even policies and
        processes to limit/restrict external queries to prevent a DDos of the whois
        servers.  And some fairly strict policies on who gets dumps of the address
        space.  As far as I know (not very far) bundling the address database
        -and- the registration data are not available to mere mortals.

        So - just how DID the Fed get the data w/o violating ARIN policy?

/bill



Current thread: